This story is being co-published with Capital & Essential

Following Beto O’Rourke’s spirited run for the U.S. Senate, highly effective voices within the Democratic Get together institution have touted the outgoing Texas congressman as a 2020 presidential candidate who, because the social gathering’s standard-bearer, would supply a imaginative and prescient of America contrasting towards that of Republicans. Nonetheless, a Capital & Essential evaluate of congressional votes exhibits that whilst O’Rourke has represented probably the most Democratic congressional districts in your entire nation, he has in lots of cases undermined his personal social gathering’s efforts to halt the GOP agenda, steadily voting towards nearly all of Home Democrats in assist of Republican payments and Trump administration positions.

Capital & Essential reviewed the 167 votes O’Rourke has solid in opposition to nearly all of his personal social gathering within the Home throughout his six-year tenure in Congress. Lots of these votes weren’t progressive dissents alongside different left-leaning lawmakers however have been as an alternative votes to assist move Republican-sponsored laws. In lots of instances, Democratic lawmakers mentioned that these measures have been designed to assist company pursuits dismantle Obama administration packages and laws.

11_14_18_BetoIowa Senate candidate Beto O’Rourke, a Texas Democrat, pumps his fist for a cheering crowd earlier than leaving a marketing campaign rally on the Alamo Metropolis Music Corridor, November 4, in San Antonio, Texas. Lower than per week after dropping his Senate race to incumbent Ted Cruz, O’Rourke was invited to Iowa, whose caucuses point out the extent of assist for presidential candidates. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Pictures

Amid persistently excessive financial inequality and a local weather change disaster, O’Rourke has voted for GOP payments that his fellow Democratic lawmakers mentioned strengthened Republicans’ tax agenda, chipped away on the Inexpensive Care Act, weakened Wall Road laws, boosted the fossil gasoline {industry} and bolstered Trump’s immigration coverage. Client, environmental, public well being and civil rights organizations have solid laws backed by O’Rourke as aiding large banks, undermining the battle towards local weather change and supporting Trump’s anti-immigrant program. Throughout the earlier administration, President Barack Obama’s White Home issued statements slamming two GOP payments backed by the 46-year-old Democratic legislator.

O’Rourke’s votes for Republican tax, commerce, well being care, prison justice and immigration-related laws not solely defied his nationwide social gathering, but in addition at occasions put him at odds even with a majority of Texas Democratic lawmakers in Congress. Such votes underscore his membership within the New Democrat Coalition, the faction of Home Democrats most intently aligned with enterprise pursuits. 

O’Rourke didn’t reply to Capital & Essential’s questions on his votes.

The potential for an O’Rourke presidential candidacy has been boosted in current weeks by former Obama aides and fundraisers, in addition to by Third Approach—a finance-industry funded suppose tank that beforehand made headlines deriding Democratic U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren. He has additionally been lauded by former Hillary Clinton aide Neera Tanden of the Middle for American Progress—a Democratic suppose tank whose officers just lately slammed Republican tax and immigration laws that O’Rourke voted for. A lot of the social gathering elite’s assist for an O’Rourke candidacy has not mentioned his coverage report or agenda.

donald, trump, poll, indict, president, mueller President Donald Trump listens throughout a roundtable dialogue on the Federal Fee on Faculty Security report within the Roosevelt Room on the White Home, on December 18. Over 70 % of voters say {that a} president must be topic to indictment whereas in workplace moderately than after their time period is over. Al Drago/Bloomberg by way of Getty Pictures

Within the final two years, O’Rourke was among the many high fifth of all lawmakers voting towards nearly all of his social gathering. FiveThirtyEight has calculated that in that very same time interval, O’Rourke has voted for the Trump administration place on laws roughly 30 % of the time. The web site mentioned that’s above what analysts predict would come from a legislator representing a district as Democratic as O’Rourke’s. For comparability, O’Rourke’s congressional district votes extra Democratic than most districts in Massachusetts, in accordance with the Prepare dinner Political Report.

Every vote reviewed under was one during which O’Rourke broke from nearly all of legislators in his personal social gathering.

Client Safety

Since its creation in 2010, the Client Monetary Safety Bureau has been below relentless assault by Republicans, who’ve sought to assist the monetary {industry} restrict its authority. At occasions, they’ve discovered an ally in O’Rourke.

In a single occasion, the Texas Democrat helped the GOP problem the company’s efforts to fight discriminatory lending practices. At situation was a 2013 CFPB bulletin asserting its “authority to pursue auto lenders whose insurance policies hurt shoppers by illegal discrimination.” The company mentioned, “Analysis signifies that markup practices could result in African People and Hispanics being charged greater markups than different, equally located, white shoppers.”

The transfer—and a subsequent CFPB enforcement motion towards a significant auto lender—despatched a shockwave by the monetary {industry}. Republicans issued a report criticizing the rule, and in 2015 launched laws to repeal it. Civil rights teams such because the NAACP opposed the GOP measure and Home Democrats mentioned it was designed to halt “current actions to root out discriminatory practices amongst auto lenders.”

Democrat Eleanor Holmes Norton, a former chairwoman of the Equal Employment Alternative Fee, mentioned in a congressional flooring speech that the Republican laws would restrict regulators’ “capacity to guard shoppers from racial discrimination within the auto lending market and provides auto sellers a leg up in charging greater rates of interest.” The Obama White Home issued an official assertion of administration coverage, saying it strongly opposed the Republican invoice, as a result of the CFPB steering at situation would “guarantee prospects should not charged disproportionately greater costs for auto loans due to their race, coloration, faith or different traits that shouldn’t have any bearing on mortgage selections.”

O’Rourke nonetheless formally co-sponsored the invoice and voted for it. Echoing the GOP’s line of assault on the CFPB, the Democrat faulted the company for a “lack of openness,” which he asserted had created “uncertainty, criticism of the CFPB’s conclusions, and has made loans dearer to debtors.” Whereas O’Rourke later voted towards utilizing the Congressional Evaluation Act to kill the CFPB’s regulation, the unique invoice he voted for set the stage for the GOP to repeal it below Trump.

Additionally in 2015, O’Rourke voted for a separate Republican invoice that Democratic legislators mentioned was designed to delay a CFPB regulation and weaken lending disclosure protections for residence mortgage debtors. California Rep. Maxine Waters, the senior Democrat on the Home Monetary Providers Committee, mentioned the invoice would make it tougher for shoppers to sue lenders once they have been misled, which represented “a drastic departure from present legislation” below the longstanding Reality In Lending Act.

The Obama administration agreed, issuing a veto menace declaring that the GOP invoice aimed to “unnecessarily delay implementation of necessary shopper protections designed to eradicate opaque lending practices that contribute to dangerous mortgages, damage householders by eradicating the personal proper of motion for violations, and undercut the Nation’s monetary stability.”

A day after that veto menace, the invoice handed with the assist of O’Rourke, who mentioned, “I imagine it’s a sensible, short-term compromise that may present long-term advantages to shoppers in america.” He argued that the GOP laws would enable regulators to “proceed working with banks to make sure that they’re prepared to totally adjust to the legislation” and was designed to ensure that “shoppers making use of for residence mortgages are given all the knowledge they want.”

READ  ‘Pokémon Sword and Defend’ Pretend Gun Emblem Seems In Newspaper Story

Along with votes on CFPB-related points, O’Rourke has additionally often sided with Republicans on meals labeling legal guidelines.

In 2015, for example, he was one in every of 66 Democrats who voted for a Republican invoice “to repeal nation of origin labeling necessities with respect to beef, pork, and hen,” in accordance with the invoice’s textual content. Within the laws’s committee report, the GOP asserted that the invoice was essential to keep away from retaliation from different buying and selling companion nations. Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, argued that lawmakers “mustn’t let a number of meatpacking firms use commerce disputes as an excuse to intestine necessary shopper protections and the rights of farmers on this nation…our individuals deserve a proper to know the place their meals is produced and the place it comes from.”

A 12 months later, Republicans introduced ahead a invoice that Democrats mentioned would undermine provisions within the Inexpensive Care Act requiring eating places to reveal dietary info. Public well being teams such because the American Most cancers Society and the American Coronary heart Affiliation requested Democrats to oppose the invoice, and O’Rourke’s fellow Texas Democratic Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee gave a flooring speech asserting that it will “scale back the probability that customers will obtain clear and constant calorie info at chain meals service institutions.”

O’Rourke was one in every of solely 33 Democrats to vote for it.

Fossil Fuels/Vitality

Throughout his Senate race, O’Rourke was lauded for his rhetoric about the specter of local weather change. In Congress, he has questioned the protection of pure gasoline fracking, and he will get excessive rankings from the League of Conservation Voters.

However whereas local weather scientists say policymakers should halt new fossil gasoline exploration, O’Rourke has pushed again towards the notion that the world should resolve between carbon emissions and clear power. As a substitute, he has insisted that “we are able to reject the false selection between oil and gasoline and renewable power.” In the meantime, he has solid key votes with Republicans to spice up the fossil gasoline {industry} whose carbon emissions are on the root of the disaster.

05_31_fossil_fuels_01 The burning of fossil fuels. Sukree Sukplang/Reuters

As an example, O’Rourke was one in every of solely a handful of Home Democrats who twice voted for Republican payments to raise the 40-year-old oil export ban.

Throughout the legislative debate over lifting the ban, the Democrats’ committee report argued that “the acute strategy taken by this invoice not solely repeals present crude export restrictions, but in addition ensures that no export restrictions – for any motive – may very well be applied or enforced sooner or later.” The Democratic report, authored by Home Commerce Committee rating Rep. Frank Pallone, D-N.J., added that “the vaguely drafted provisions of the invoice may have probably huge penalties for shoppers, the setting and local weather change, and nationwide safety.”

That argument proved to be convincing to many Texas Democrats. On one of many votes, 5 out of 11 Texas Democratic lawmakers opposed the invoice. On the opposite vote, seven Texas Democrats opposed the invoice, with O’Rourke amongst solely three who supported it. O’Rourke’s 2018 Senate marketing campaign web site boasts that “Beto voted to repeal the Crude Oil Export Ban to assist our economic system and nationwide safety.”

Passage of the O’Rourke-backed laws was adopted by a tripling of petroleum exports. With the export ban lifted, a current report from the Worldwide Vitality Company projected that america will probably be exporting 5 million barrels of oil a day by 2023 — all whereas scientists warn of catastrophic results of carbon emissions.

On the identical time, O’Rourke helped Republicans vote down Democratic laws to forestall drilling within the jap Gulf of Mexico, and he backed a separate GOP invoice to hurry up pure gasoline exports, which Pallone argued would “exacerbate local weather change by encouraging extra fossil gasoline extraction.”

He additionally supported GOP laws that Democrats mentioned was constructed to guard the utility {industry}. That invoice was launched the 12 months earlier than the current California wildfires renewed questions about utility legal responsibility. On the time, Republicans mentioned the measure was designed “to make sure dependable electrical energy service and scale back the chance of fires and hearth hazards brought on by insufficient vegetation administration” in areas the place energy strains cross federal lands.

Repeating expenses made by Democrats within the invoice’s committee report, Arizona Democratic Rep. Raul Grijalva mentioned throughout the flooring debate: “The invoice waives legal responsibility for firms that begin forest fires or trigger different harm. That is nonsense and shifts an unimaginable burden and threat onto American taxpayers.”

O’Rourke was one in every of 69 Democrats to assist the invoice, which handed.

Immigration & Felony Justice

In representing the border metropolis of El Paso, O’Rourke has been an outspoken advocate for immigration reform. In current days he has used his platform to name for public stress on the Trump administration to close down an immigrant detention heart in Tornillo, Texas and he made headlines slamming the Trump administration’s total immigration coverage. His Senate marketing campaign web site mentioned he needs to “move the DREAM Act and make sure that undocumented immigrants who have been introduced right here as youngsters, often known as ‘Dreamers,’ discover a everlasting residence and citizenship within the U.S.” It additionally declared that he needs to “finish the militarization of our immigration enforcement system.”

Nonetheless, he was one in every of a gaggle of Democrats who broke social gathering ranks to assist Republican laws to waive necessities for Customs and Border Safety (CBP) brokers and job candidates to take polygraph exams — a proposal that was a part of the Trump administration’s plan to assemble a deportation drive.

29 b 2018-10-30T112503Z_1384147390_RC192AA47000_RTRMADP_3_USA-IMMIGRATION-CARAVAN October 29, 2018
Migrants type a human chain to assist individuals cross the river between Guatemala to Mexico.
Leah Millis/Reuters

Polygraph exams have been a part of CBP’s efforts to confront the corruption and misconduct which have plagued the company in recent times. A 2012 Authorities Accountability Workplace report discovered that between 2005 and 2012, “144 present or former CBP staff have been arrested or indicted for corruption-related actions.” The report famous that CBP makes use of polygraph exams as a part of employment background checks “to mitigate the chance of worker corruption and misconduct” — and it really useful that the company contemplate increasing the exams. The report particularly famous that CBP inner affairs officers have been expressing “considerations concerning the suitability of the officers and brokers employed throughout [employment] surges as a result of most of those officers and brokers didn’t take a polygraph examination.”

In April of 2017, the Trump administration issued a memo pushing for authority to waive the polygraph exams as a way to expedite the hiring of 1000’s of recent CBP brokers. Critics instantly raised purple flags — the American Immigration Attorneys Affiliation mentioned it was a plan “to water down hiring requirements.” Tom Jawetz, the Middle for American Progress’ Vice President for Immigration, informed Univision that “many brokers introduced on beforehand who had not gone by a polygraph have been cooperating with cartels and topic to corruption.” James Tomsheck, the CBP’s former head of inner affairs, known as the concept of waivers “preposterous” in mild of what the polygraph exams had been discovering.

READ  Households of graffiti artists killed by a prepare after climbing on tracks with spray cans defend them

In comparison with different law-enforcement companies, “a bigger variety of individuals failed the examination, however the admissions of the candidates who failed the examination have been hair-raising,” Tomsheck informed The Nation. “Essentially the most stunning, frankly terrifying, have been the various candidates who admitted that they have been infiltrators. That they really labored for a drug-trafficking group and had for some time period. That they had been directed to use for the job solely for the aim of feeding info again to the prison group they labored with.”

Two days after the Trump administration’s memo, Republicans launched laws to permit the polygraph exams to be waived. The invoice—which didn’t even get a committee listening to—was authored by Arizona Republican Rep. Martha McSally, an immigration hardliner and supporter of a border wall. Throughout the flooring debate, she described the measure as a mandatory step to “present CBP with instant reduction so they can rapidly, but judiciously, rent officers and brokers.”

Democrats adamantly objected. New Mexico Democratic Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham—the chairwoman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus—mentioned “eliminating the vital polygraph necessities for sure CBP candidates solely undermines our Nation’s security, given this company’s historic connection to organized crime, drug cartels, and corruption.” She asserted that “no different federal legislation enforcement company within the nation—not the FBI, DEA, ATF, or Secret Service—makes any exceptions to their polygraph examination.”

Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-In poor health., declared: “Anybody who votes for this invoice is voting to assist and implement Donald Trump’s views on immigration, his need to militarize our southern border, and his fantasy of a mass deportation drive. You can’t spin it another means. If we wish to decrease the requirements for screening and hiring CBP officers, get rid of checks that would assist weed out candidates with prison histories or prison intentions, and water down the integrity of this necessary nationwide safety supply, this invoice is for you.”

O’Rourke opted to hitch Republicans in voting for the invoice, which handed. In a assertion after the vote, he echoed McSally’s rationale for the laws, asserting that to deal with staffing shortfalls, the invoice was essential to “assist velocity up the hiring course of and supply the CBP Commissioner further authorities to recruit and rent high quality CBP officers and Border Patrol brokers.”

Throughout the identical two-month stretch, O’Rourke additionally broke ranks from nearly all of his social gathering in supporting one other GOP measure on legislation enforcement—laws that, in accordance with GovTrack, would “add the killing or tried killing [of] a legislation enforcement officer to the listing of aggravating elements in federal dying penalty instances.”

The Management Convention on Civil and Human Rights mentioned the invoice was “an pointless and misguided try to politicize the unlucky deaths of legislation enforcement officers and will in the end exacerbate present pressure between legislation enforcement and the communities they serve, particularly African People.”

Rep. Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., argued that it will change the elemental threshold for capital punishment by “impos[ing] a dying penalty for tried homicide.” He declared: “I’m not conscious that now we have within the legislation, wherever, a dying penalty for an tried crime; and right here, we’re establishing a dying penalty for an try, an unsuccessful try.”

O’Rourke was one in every of 48 Democrats to hitch Republicans in supporting the laws, which handed.

2015-10-01T214236Z_3_LYNXNPEB902K0_RTROPTP_3_MARKETS-STOCKS The New York Inventory Change on September 1, 2015. The Dow Jones Industrial Common is on monitor to have its worst December for the reason that Nice Melancholy. Lucas Jackson/Reuters

Regulating Wall Road

For the reason that aftermath of the 2008 monetary disaster, Republicans and financial institution lobbyists have been waging a marketing campaign to whittle away the landmark Dodd-Frank laws that instituted modest monetary laws designed to keep at bay one other disaster. O’Rourke has a considerably blended report on monetary points, in accordance with the monetary watchdog group People for Monetary Reform (AFR). At occasions he has voted with Democrats to guard present laws. Nonetheless, he has additionally steadily aided the GOP in a few of its efforts, casting six votes for payments that Democrats say have been designed to assist financial institution lobbyists decontrol Wall Road.

As an example, in 2014 and 2018 O’Rourke solid votes for GOP payments that included provisions weakening the so-called Volcker Rule, which goals to forestall monetary corporations from utilizing depositors’ financial savings for their very own speculative buying and selling.

AFR despatched a letter to lawmakers warning that the 2014 invoice “incorporates a lot of probably vital deregulatory measures.” Among the many most problematic provisions, mentioned the group, have been people who “would decontrol worldwide derivatives markets”; “would tremendously weaken the CFTC’s capacity to guard towards” inappropriate transactions; and “minimize off the flexibility of the SEC to incorporate wanted investor safety measures as a part of their regulatory efforts.” The letter warned that the invoice’s “weakening of the Volcker Rule might be anticipated primarily to learn giant Wall Road banks that want to discover an finish run round proprietary buying and selling restrictions.”

Within the debate over the 2018 invoice, Democratic lawmakers on the Home Monetary Providers Committee famous that the laws was “the newest try to weaken the Volcker Rule, a cornerstone of Wall Road reform enacted within the wake of the monetary disaster.”

Additionally in 2017 and 2018:

– O’Rourke voted for GOP laws that Democrats mentioned would empower monetary establishments to defend themselves from financial institution examiners. Home Democrats on the Monetary Providers Committee described the invoice as one attempting to “postpone materials supervisory determinations by the financial institution’s regulator” and “make it extra seemingly that megabanks would be capable to escape or delay accountability for egregious violations of federal legal guidelines defending shoppers and the economic system.” AFR begged lawmakers to oppose it, saying: “The affect of this laws in weakening financial institution supervision can be particularly nice on the nation’s largest banks. Its impact can be to considerably improve the chance of systemic issues, and of unfair and predatory remedy of shoppers.”

– O’Rourke voted for a package deal of Republican payments that Democrats mentioned would scale back impartial audits of firms, decontrol inventory exchanges and prohibit regulators’ capacity to watch high-frequency buying and selling. The laws adopted a sequence of “flash crashes” that despatched inventory costs tumbling and that prompted new guidelines from the Securities and Change Fee. Lower than two years earlier than the GOP laws, former Democratic U.S. Sen. Ted Kaufman warned that except regulators strengthened their oversight, the economic system was weak to a repeat of the flash crashes. O’Rourke supported the GOP invoice, regardless that Rep. Waters identified that the GOP laws “would ease the flexibility of excessive frequency merchants to govern the inventory markets undetected [and] encourage a regulatory race-to-the-bottom at our nation’s inventory exchanges.”

– O’Rourke voted for a Republican invoice to allow bigger variety of financial institution holding firms to tackle extra debt. In a sentiment echoed by Home Democrats, AFR famous that the coverage would enable bigger banks to “extra simply purchase smaller neighborhood banks, decreasing the variety of impartial neighborhood banks.”

— O’Rourke voted for a Republican invoice to weaken necessities for monetary corporations to tell prospects that their private info is being shared with third-party firms. The vote on the deregulatory laws—which was backed by Wall Road lobbying teams—got here solely weeks after Equifax uncovered tens of millions of People’ private info to hackers. Republicans argued that the invoice was mandatory to cut back “the regulatory burden upon, significantly, our struggling neighborhood monetary establishments, our neighborhood banks, and credit score unions.”

Democrats on the Monetary Providers Committee urged a “no” vote, arguing that the invoice “would get rid of significant, clear disclosures to shoppers about their privateness rights, together with their capacity to opt-out from having their info offered to unaffiliated third social gathering firms.”


In 2015, congressional Democrats, labor unions, environmental teams and shopper organizations have been frantically attempting to dam a Republican measure to move Commerce Promotion Authority, which offers presidents extra unilateral energy to barter commerce offers, with much less enter from Congress.

The measure—backed by a highly effective company foyer—was significantly fraught as a result of it was seen as a prerequisite for the Trans Pacific Partnership. That proposed 12-nation commerce deal had turn into a supply of nationwide debate, as a result of—amongst different issues— it included controversial provisions to empower international firms to make use of worldwide tribunals to overturn native, state and federal legal guidelines.

Throughout the flooring debate, the opposition was led by Rep. Sander Levin, D-MI, who argued {that a} “sure” vote meant “saying ‘high-quality’ to giving personal buyers in rising numbers the flexibility to decide on an unregulated arbitration panel as an alternative of a well-established judicial system as a way to overturn native or nationwide well being or environmental laws.”

Rep. Nydia Velasquez, D-N.Y., equally argued that “we’re being requested to vote for an settlement that may value jobs, undermine environmental protections, and erode employees’ rights, all within the identify of so-called free commerce.” The vote, she mentioned, “comes all the way down to a easy query: Are you going to aspect with Wall Road, giant firms, and their lobbyists, or will you stand with working households in your district?”

In the long run, the opposition was not sufficient—TPA handed twice by razor-thin margins. As soon as once more O’Rourke broke ranks with Home Democrats and many of the Texas Democratic delegation to solid essential votes to move the GOP invoice.

Within the aftermath, O’Rourke—who has additionally been a promoter of the North American Free Commerce Settlement—refused to concede that his vote was an indication of assist for the TPP.

“My vote for TPA isn’t a vote for TPP and doesn’t give the President the authority to commit this nation to TPP,” he mentioned in a assertion on the time. “The truth is, if the President fails to fulfill the bold targets outlined in TPA, I’ll vote towards TPP.”

Well being Care

Together with laws to totally repeal giant parts of the Obama-era Inexpensive Care Act, Republicans have additionally mounted a death-by-a-thousands-cuts technique towards the landmark laws. O’Rourke has been a supporter of bettering Obamacare, increasing Medicaid and including a public choice to compete with personal insurance coverage. In three cases, although, he broke with nearly all of Home Democrats to assist Republicans, and in a single occasion, he backed a GOP invoice Democrats mentioned was designed to prop up the Trump administration’s makes an attempt to switch Obamacare.

The ACA established the Impartial Cost Advisory Board to suggest methods to cut back Medicare spending. Within the phrases of its chief proponent, former Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., the board “was created to guard Medicare for seniors – by bettering the standard of Medicare providers and by extending the lifetime of Medicare for years to come back.”

In accordance with the nonpartisan Middle on Funds and Coverage Priorities, the language creating the board prohibited it from proposing rationing, diminished advantages, greater premiums or restricted eligibility. Regardless of these safeguards, Republicans led by former vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin quickly pointed to the board as proof that Democrats have been aiming to create “dying panels.” In a 2010 Wall Road Journal op-ed, Palin asserted that the board would create “‘dying panel’-like rationing” that makes “bureaucrats, not medical professionals, the final word arbiters of what kinds of remedy will (and particularly won’t) be reimbursed below Medicare.”

As that mythology unfold all through conservative media, Republicans in 2015 and 2017introduced up laws to stoke these fears and get rid of the board.

Representing Democrats on the Methods and Means Committee, Rep. Richard Neal, D-Mass., wrote within the invoice report that the laws was a part of “Republicans’ piecemeal try to dismantle the well being reform.”

O’Rourke defied his social gathering and twice voted with Republicans to kill the board. He additionally formally co-sponsored each measures. He moreover broke together with his social gathering by voting for a separate Republican measure to require extra reporting about well being alternate enrollment. Pallone, the New Jersey Democrat, solid the laws as an effort to drown federal officers in pointless paperwork and “impede the efforts of the administration to implement the Inexpensive Care Act.”

Just a few years later, when Republicans have been pushing to switch the ACA with Trump’s American Well being Care Act (AHCA), O’Rourke voted for Republican laws to supply particular tax credit for COBRA advantages—an initiative that Democrats mentioned was a part of the bigger Trump scheme to kill off the ACA and get rid of protections for People with preexisting circumstances.

“The AHCA would enable insurers to cost older People as much as 5 occasions greater than they cost youthful People,” Neal mentioned throughout the flooring debate. “The tax credit in [the bill] wouldn’t make COBRA protection any extra reasonably priced for the American individuals. As well as, it may probably weaken the chance pool protection as a result of it will encourage older and sicker employees to stay on COBRA that would damage small companies. That is merely a backdoor means for States to discriminate towards present circumstances.”


In 2017, O’Rourke joined his social gathering in voting towards President Donald Trump’s tax minimize package deal, which delivered large advantages to firms and the rich. His Senate marketing campaign web site cited deficit considerations about these tax cuts’ value.

However that was not the top of the story for Republicans. Inside months, they started urgent a brand new package deal of tax cuts that Democratic teams, such because the Middle for American Progress, deemed the “Tax Rip-off 2.” One piece of that package deal was a proposal {that a} vital Los Angeles Occasions editorial mentioned “would carve out a brand new tax shelter for start-up companies.”

As Democrats sought to current a unified entrance towards the brand new GOP tax cuts, O’Rourke broke ranks with Home Democrats—and many of the Texas Democratic delegation—to vote for the GOP laws. He supported the initiative, regardless that the Congressional Funds Workplace warned that the invoice would broaden the deficit.

This text was first revealed by Capital & Essential and The Guardian. 


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here